Attacked by two justices, lower-court judges and litigants, the 1964 ruling in New York Times v. Sullivan keeps getting cited ...
Justices could use the case to weaken press freedom protections stemming from the New York Times vs. Sullivan ruling. Wynn ...
Green energy industrialist Dale Vince’s libel case against former London mayoral candidate Lord Shaun Bailey over allegations ...
Steve Wynn has appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court to reconsider the libel protections set in the 1964 New York Times v. Sullivan decision. This pivotal appeal could impact defamation claims by public ...
Mahathir, 99, said his media interview after a court proceeding on Dec 5 was merely a repeat of what he had testified in the libel suit brought ... as a trier of fact and law, could not be easily ...
To oversimplify matters somewhat, under Indiana libel law, a libel claim based on speech on matters of public concern can only prevail based on a showing of knowing or reckless falsehood—mere ...
9d
Hosted on MSNZahid’s contempt bid aimed at delaying libel trial, says Dr MThe former prime minister says contempt proceedings are unnecessary as Ahmad Zahid Hamidi will get to testify when he takes ...
Pennsylvania State Senator Dan Laughlin's libel suit against the Erie Reader ... according to documents Erie Times-News obtained under Right-to-Know Law Laughlin, who claimed Erie Reader ...
It was an unusual ruling against a media outlet in a defamation case. Libel laws are generally protective of news organizations, and plaintiffs must meet a high standard to prove defamation.
It was an unusual ruling against a media outlet in a defamation case. Libel laws are generally protective of news organizations, and plaintiffs must meet a high standard to prove defamation.
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results