News
IARC, WHO’s cancer research arm, takes that science and does a hazard assessment. The committee looks at items such as chemicals, viruses and food additives to determine if any can cause cancer.
My cancer journey taught me that nothing is certain; however, with support, humor and acceptance, we can weather the ups and ...
In my case, I was convinced the drug in question was a lifesaver. When I first learned I had ovarian cancer, in 2008, every medical professional consulted agreed that I would die of recurrent ...
It is impossible to conceive of truly modern cancer care in the absence of biomarkers. In breast cancer, we routinely need information about such genes as PI3K, ESR1, and HER2 to know how to treat ...
British Journal of Cancer - A randomised controlled trial of nurse-managed trial conclusion following early phase cancer trial participation Skip to main content Thank you for visiting nature.com.
A new study says that most cancer screening doesn’t save lives. But proving that kind of negative isn’t just hard — it’s impossible.
Between 1999 and 2009 in the United Kingdom, 82,429 men between 50 and 69 years of age received a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test. Localized prostate cancer was diagnosed in 2664 men. Of these ...
A growing number of cancer patients, ... thought it was a foregone conclusion that she would have to undergo chemotherapy when a cancerous lump was found in her breast in 2019.
Results that may be inaccessible to you are currently showing.
Hide inaccessible results